Tuesday, July 28, 2009

FIVE CURRENT TRENDS IN MISSIONS




As we move into the Third Millennium since Jesus first gave us our marching orders, what are some current trends and concerns in missions? We still rejoice in the biographies of Adoniram Judson, David Brainerd and John G Paton, even while we recognize our need to keep abreast of the dizzying flood of worldwide changes just within the last 4 decades. While our Lord is the same in every generation, the world is much-changed.

I summarize a list of current missiological trends below. Please use this list as a starting point for further research.




Current missiological trends:


Trend 1. - The changing context of mission - the shifting center of Christianity:

A Shift Towards the non-Western world:

Missions is no longer “From the West to the Rest.” Those that profess a broadly evangelical faith now have their majority in the non-Western world. Latin America, Africa and Asia are blooming even while North America and Europe are withering and decaying. In 1945 over 80% of the non-Western world was dominated by the West. By 1974 this became less than 5%. During this same period church attendance in the Anglican Church in Britain decreased by 14% in Britain even while the membership rolls in Sudan increased by 633%! African bishops from the “Global South” are now sending missionaries to bolster the apostatizing Anglican Church in the West against increasing defection from the faith. Christianity is no longer a Western religion; the center has shifted.

Missions – increasingly urban, Asian, and in partnership with national Christian bodies:

While rural, tribal missions may excite the fascinations of many, the future of missions may not be the Auca Story in Through Gates of Splendor or even the Sawi story in Don Richardson’s Peacechild. The future of missions is largely to be urban and Asian, and among highly refined cultures holding to Islam, Hinduism or Buddhism, rather than scattered “primitive” animistic tribes. The need for missionaries to Asian cities is great. For example, think on this: while the US has about 9 cities with a population over 1 million, China has close to 150 cities of a million or more.

I freely admit that my own missions scenario in Papua, focusing on a remote tribe, is not the wave of the future. But it affords me close strategic involvement with the national church denomination, Gereja Injili di Indonesia (GIDI), the Evangelical Church in Indonesia, which consists of over 400,000 members and is led by 40,000 evangelists and pastors. My local team of highland evangelists, laboring among my tribal group, consists of 20 evangelists and I am able to influence GIDI as a whole through my involvement in this effort.

This brings us to another shift in missions within the last 50-100 years. Missions now must be done, and should be done, in increasing partnering with national Christians. Why bypass those that the Lord has providentially raised up? Enabling indigenous believers and mobilizing local bodies of believers to reach others in their own region of the world is a strategic and God-honoring priority. Partnership is the watchword for missions today in many regions of the world.

The West is no longer the center of mission-sending. Vital hubs of missionary sending are springing up across the world, islands of vital Christianity in a sea of darkness. No longer content to receive missionaries only, these “new sending countries” are striving to send out their own missionaries. For instance, South Korea is on the verge of overtaking the U.S. as the top missions sending nation. I work with one man from the country of Papua New Guinea, the other side of the island here, who felt the Lord calling him to cross the border and labor among his less fortunate brothers in Indonesia.

Our task today as Western missionaries is not merely in going alone to the dark places of the world ourselves, but our task lays also in enabling vital pockets of Non-Western Christians to also reach those dark areas closest to them. We multiply ourselves, becoming catalysts, when we help mobilize national Christians. Right now, there are highland Papuan tribal believers, like the Dani and the Yali, that are being trained to take the Gospel to lowland tribes. Not only that, but there are also Papuan evangelists being trained to be sent to the other islands in Indonesia, and even out of their own country into PNG and also among the Australian aborigines. Missions now has become a global enterprise, the Gospel from everywhere to everywhere.

For further research:
• Philip Jenkins, The Next Christendom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
• Martin I. Klauber and Scott M. Manetsch, editors, The Great Commission: Evangelicals and the History of World Missions (Nashville: B&H Publishing Group, 2008).
• Bryant L. Myers, The New Context of World Missions (Monrovia, California: MARC, 1996).




Trend 2. The changing focus of mission: The modern People-group focus:

If you have read John Piper’s Let the Nations be Glad (second edition, pages 155-200) you will be familiar with the concept of people-groups. Whereas by the 1950’s the Gospel had penetrated every country (nation state) on earth, there were still billions without the Gospel. Thousands of ethnic groups were not only not being reached, but were not even being targeted.

One high-level missions strategy coordinator revealed to me how his missions board for years colored the entire country of India red, meaning that his particular mission agency had a “missionary presence” in that nation. In reality, there was one lone single female missionary for a country possessing around 2,500 ethno-linguistically distinct people-groups and almost a billion people! He laughed when he told me this and stated how thankful he was that missions had caught onto the concept of people-group thinking.

How did the concept of “unreached people-groups” come about? Ralph Winter, the founder of the William Carey Library and the U.S. Center of World Missions, working through the Lausanne Committee on World Evangelization, championed the concept of “unreached people-groups” in the late 70’s and 80’s. He asserted that the ethne of Scripture that we are supposed to reach are not political nation-states at all. They are, instead, cultures within those countries, possessing ethnic and linguistic identities distinct from others.

John Piper points out the firm theological basis for the people-group focus of Scripture. The Apostle Paul in Romans 15:18-21 speaks of having “fully preached” the Gospel from Jerusalem as far as Illyricum. Paul claims to have “fulfilled” (peplerokenai) the Gospel in that whole region. This does not mean that he preached to every single soul in that region, nor does it mean that Paul did not believe that further workers were needed in this mission field; Paul, after all, placed Timothy in Ephesus (I Tim. 1:3) and Titus in Crete (Titus 1:5) to mature the work. Paul’s phrase “fulfilled the Gospel” means this; Paul had a people-group focus. Paul desired to focus on pioneer areas to win many peoples rather than merely as many people as possible, so that God would be praised by all peoples (Romans 15:11), Abraham would be the father of many nations (Romans 4:17), and the name of Christ would be understood in every people group where He is not known (Romans 15:21).

Our goal in discipling the nations is not merely to win people, but to win peoples. Our task is not merely to gain the maximum quantity of people, winning more and more people to Christ, but in winning more and more peoples, ethno-linguistic groups, some from every tongue, tribe and nation. Our goal goes beyond winning as many souls or planting as many churches as possible, our goal is to win souls and plant churches in as many unreached peoples as possible and to cross every existing barrier with the Gospel.

Psalm 22:27:

All the ends of the earth shall remember and turn to the Lord, and all the families of the nations shall worship before him.

Churches and sending agencies now make tremendous efforts to find and research the various people-groups of the world and intentionally target them. This has led to a broadly evangelical ecumenism in cooperative efforts such as the Joshua Project and Caleb Project, whereby unreached people-groups have been listed, quantified, and, as much as able, prioritized so that new workers need not replicate services but can allocate resources most effectively to speed the Great Commission. The people-group concept, therefore, has encouraged cooperativeness across denominational lines and has also promoted an openness to the social sciences as research and statistics on various demographics across the globe are gathered and sent out to churches in order to promote missions, mobilize workers and to fill identified needs.

Many will pooh-pooh this use of anthropology, statistics and the social sciences in dividing up the earth and trying to prioritize the lost. This is both a matter of theological priority, however, and also simple stewardship. A lost soul in Atlanta, Georgia is just as lost as a lost soul in the remote jungle, after all, but why should the lost in Atlanta, Georgia be able to squander thousands upon thousands of opportunities while I must walk two days through muddy swamp in order to tell some about Jesus? This research helps our stewardship. We honor God by finding the darkest hole in which to plant ourselves.

Keep in mind, also, that this research is nothing more than what William Carey himself did in his famous Enquiry into the Obligations of Christians to use Means for the Conversion of the Heathen, whereby he gathered the most current data of his day about every group of people under the sun in an effort to aid research about where to send missionaries and how best to pray for world evangelization. Narrow, local thinking is insufficient for the global task before us.


My own use of the people-group concept to inform my decision-making: Why did I choose to go to SE Asia? How did I pick the tribe that I would go to? My decisions were informed by my people-group thinking.

My country of service possesses 127 unreached-people groups, not even including the 274 listed languages in Papua (I know several more languages not yet listed). Of these 274-plus Papuan language-groups, i.e. ethne, about 70 have at least Scripture portions, leaving about 200 without the Scripture. Of these, the most unreached are scattered into 14 Daerah Terpencil, the “14 most isolated areas,” of which my area makes up one of the largest of these areas, and possessing the most unreached tribes. I chose my ministry place based on which groups suffered the highest geographic and linguistic barriers to the Gospel. I prioritized the lost in a sort of missiological triage.

For further research:

• John Piper, Let the Nations be Glad (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2003).
• John Piper, “The Supremacy of God among ‘All the Nations,’ ” International Journal of Frontier Missions, 13:1, January-March 1996, 16.
• R. Showalter, “All the Clans, All the Peoples,” International Journal of Frontier Missions, 13:1 (January-March 1996):12.
• Frank Severn, “Some Thoughts on the Meaning of ‘All the Nations,’ ” Evangelical Missions Quarterly, October 1997, 415.
• Harley Schreck and David Barrett , eds., Unreached Peoples: Clarifying the Task (Monrovia, California: MARC, 1987), 44-56.
• Patrick Johnstone, The Church is Bigger Than You Think (Pasadena, CA: William Carey Library, 1998), 89-93.




Trend 3. The current trend of Short-term missions:


Short-term mission trips have emerged as one of the most significant current trends in missions. Missiologists are divided as to whether this trend is a healthy one or one fraught with dangers.

Some point out statistics demonstrating that short-term trips generate long-term missionaries, most long-term missionaries having been on at least 2 short-term trips prior to committing to long-term “career” missions. Others doubt these statistics and show that as the number of short-term trips has risen, there has failed to be a concurrent rise in long-term missionaries. Instead, the number of long-term missionaries is on the decline and long-term missionaries increasingly fall short in finding enough missionary support to maintain them, even while American churches spend millions on short-term trips. The Masters Mission, for example writes that, on average, a single two-week short-term missions trip costs more than generously funding one long-term family on the field for one whole year.

In addition, as God raises up maturing Third World churches and leaders, imagine the reaction of these African and Asian men of God as they are met by minimally-trained American high-schoolers, presuming to be able to teach these national Christians about the things of God. Imagine such a group, wearing their clothes from the Gap and toting I-pods, taking two weeks off to teach persecuted Sundanese believers about the Biblical doctrine of suffering and persecution? Preposterous!

In this day of modern air travel and quick access to most places on the globe, I would hate to discourage anyone from seeing places in the world that may still be legitimately called “the mission field.” I long to see visitors here who are open to missions, who want to see the beauty of Indonesia, and who are open to the possibility of coming back to serve full-time. With proper preparation, short-term missions can be a wonderful recruiting tool to give home churches a taste of overseas ministry. Through short-term missions, Western churches can make strategic partnerships with solid Third-World believers so that these American churches may aid missions through already-established local bodies. Also, in highly technical fields of expertise, short term missionaries are a major blessing in areas such as well-digging, water purification, mobile cataract surgery clinics, first-aid courses, farming aid, computer care and even seminars on select doctrinal and leadership topics.

I would like to stress, however, that years of language learning and a living long-term presence among a people is often necessary for the Gospel to enter deeply enough into a culture to transform it. Short-term missions are fine, but please do not make them an end unto themselves. They are a means to an end; the recruitment of long-term workers and the initiation of long-term partnerships. One colleague here in Papua, serving in a remote tribe, labored for 10 years before the Lord gave him the spiritual fruit of one believer. Another missionary, after 20 years, had only one person believe in their village - and he died this year! The tribe that I am laboring among are very ignorant of the Gospel and the work may take just as long or longer.

There is, now more than ever, a need for long-term workers.

For further research:

• Dan McDonough and Roger Peterson, Can Short-Term Mission Really Create Long-term Missionaries? (Stem Press, 1999).
• The Master’s Mission, “Avoiding the Pitfalls of Short-term Missions,” Pastor’s Journal 5, accessed at www.mastersmission.org.




Trend 4. Healthier attempts towards broad, cooperative evangelical efforts are now replacing unhealthy ecumenism


Ecumenism has almost become a bad word among the faithful due to the poor showing of past efforts at broad cooperation, such as heresies promoted by some in the World Council of Churches. New efforts at ecumenicity, however, are on the rise and are now more strongly undergirded by basic evangelical doctrinal safeguards.

At the end of the last century, a rising tide of missions zeal contributed to the formation of the Student Volunteer Movement. With its watchword as, “The evangelization of the world in this generation” the SVM helped to mobilize thousands into missions across denominational lines. This zeal peaked in a world missionary conference in 1910 at Edinburgh. This worldwide conference was not a new idea at all, but originated in the forward-thinking mind of William Carey, who hoped himself to see a “general association of all denominations of Christians” meet about every 10 years, beginning in 1810. His dream was realized 100 years late.

Despite great beginnings, these efforts at broad cooperation steered more and more off-course, sacrificing doctrinal purity to gain greater organizational unity. As the World Council of Churches grew into the main voice for ecumenism during the mid-20th Century, doctrines such as the uniqueness of Christ and justification by faith were minimized. In response, many of the faithful fled from ecumenical missions efforts altogether and grew suspicious of all cooperative efforts, growing isolative and critical of any who desired to seek broader partnership.

Recently, however, missions has experienced a resurgence in efforts towards shared resources, broad cooperation, the avoidance of duplication of services, and a decrease in interdenominational infighting among evangelical Protestants. In July of 1974, the International Congress on World Evangelization was held in Lausanne, Switzerland, and this led to the ongoing Lausanne Committee on World Evangelization, with worldwide meetings about every decade. The majority of the delegates were non-Western and over 150 countries attended. A basic evangelical doctrinal statement was adopted.

Also, within the past two decades, collaborative evangelical efforts such as the Joshua Project, the Caleb Project, Operation World and Operation Mobilization have all emerged to better research and allocate resources for missions. These groups are broadly evangelical and serve to compile data and better our stewardship of limited missions resources. I myself have submitted data to the Joshua Project to help enlarge their database on Papuan tribes.

Despite the dangers involved, this cooperativeness must be seen as a positive development. While each individual effort must be weighed accordingly and accepted or rejected on its own merits, broad cooperation being only possible with those sharing solid doctrinal foundations, these current efforts at research and information-sharing are laudable and I myself have utilized much of this research in investigating and surveying needs in Indonesia.

For further research:

• Roth Rowse, “William Carey’s ‘Pleasing Dream,’” International Review of Missions, volume 38 (1949), 181.





Trend 5. Persecution, the demise of colonialism, and the return to Pre-Constantinianism



Pre-Constantinianism? What do I mean by this term?


This term attempts to characterize how the church operated prior to the contaminating influences of the era of Constantine on the early church. Pre-Constantinianism includes two main thoughts, (1) that missions is now being done in the face of the disappearance of Western colonial power and in a manner more reflective of New Testament practice, and (2) Pre-Constantinianism is an attempt to show that missions is now increasingly being done in places where there is a rise in persecution, without the protection of Western governments.

The early church, an oppressed minority, spread like wildfire. From the fringes of power rather than the center, poor and persecuted Christians multiplied despite having no civil backing and little wealth, spreading not only despite persecution but often because of persecution. With Constantinian preference, the church and the civil state married into an unholy matrimony that not even the Protestant Reformation remedied. Christianity spread only with the spread of the civil state. The fiction of “Christendom” crept in. The Protestant Reformation did not expunge these faults and the new Protestant States continued these errors with the policy of, “cuius regio eius religio,” stating that whoever’s region it was, that also was the religion, the political powers fixing religion.
The Moravians were the first to send out missionaries not associated with the colonizing powers; and what a great example of missionary devotion they continue to be, even selling themselves as slaves to evangelize poor plantation workers. The Moravian Church sent out missionaries at a rate of 1 in every 12, a virtual tithe of church members into missions, and inspired William Carey, who proposed that voluntary associations of private Christians, i.e., missionary societies, be formed to reach the world for Christ, an idea that launched the Modern Missions Movement.
Missions is almost entirely done now by groups not wedded to the State and missionaries are increasingly finding ways into hostile regions where persecution is not merely a possibility, but an expectation. There has never been a time when more Muslims are turning to Christ. In North Africa, the small embers of churches that have long been almost stamped into extinction are now beginning to blaze anew, despite renewed persecution.
In Indonesia, the world’s largest Muslim country, there is periodic violence against Christians and hundreds have been killed, and hundreds of churches have been burned or closed. Despite all of this, the official statistics regarding Christians are constantly in need of revision as perhaps over 20 million Christians now exist in this beleaguered country.
A case study: Indonesia is a wonderful illustration of the blessings of this current trend. During the Dutch Colonization, evangelism was slow going and national Christians succeeded where many Western mission efforts failed. Many Dutch mission efforts failed altogether, most Javanese thinking that to become Christian was to model the overly rigid Dutch Reformed patterns of ecclesiology and even adopt Dutch dress. National identity and religion merged into one amorphous mass. Islam and Christianity actually entered the interior of Java at about the same general time period and yet, due to hatred of the Dutch colonizers, more and more Javanese turned to Islam until it became the clear majority all throughout the region, despite “Christian” powers being in control and despite vigorous efforts by Dutch missionaries, who rode the colonial ships over to land on the mission field and lived besides tea plantation masters. Since Merdeka (Independence), and especially since Islamic fundamentalism has begun to gain power, Christianity has spread like wildfire.





Other trends briefly explained:



Space does not allow a full treatment of all the current trends in missions, but below are a few more current missiological trends to consider as we end this article:

• -Missions giving is steadily decreasing.

• -Also those activities supported under the title of “missions” continues to increasingly involve things other than frontier church-planting among the least-reached peoples of the world.

• -Smaller missions are ceasing to exist, mission societies are merging together and more local churches are trying to directly send out missionaries. While this is positive in regards to local church involvement, many of these churches, ignorant of global concerns and well-tried methods, fall into the same or greater errors than the missionary societies that they are trying to replace.

• -Missions is increasingly becoming full of “niche” ministries. Specialization in small technical areas such as aviation, computers, and health work is increasingly becoming more common. Missionary “generalists,” those not possessing some unique trade besides theological preparation, are increasingly becoming rarer.

• -Finally, one last healthy trend is this: churches and agencies are increasingly becoming more “missions focused” rather than “missionary focused.” This means that churches are catching a vision to strategically reach peoples rather than merely supporting their own missionaries.



Whole books could be written, and are being written about the ramifications of such trends. In this short article, such deep analysis is impossible. If you would like to discuss any of these points further, please feel free to email me at oct31st1517@hotmail.com.

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Further Reading on The Missionary Call




David Sills just published a new book on the missionary call, which I highly recommend.




In addition to Sills' book, check out this list below:



Allen, Frank. “Why do they leave? Reflections on Attrition.” Evangelical Missions Quarterly, April, 1986.

Goff, William E. “Missionary Call and Service.” in Terry, Mark, Smith, Ebbie and Anderson, Justice. Missiology: An Introduction to the Foundations, History, and Strategies of World Missions. Nashville, Tennessee: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 1998.

Griffiths, Michael C. Give up Your Small Ambitions. Chicago: Moody Press, 1971.

Hale, Thomas. On Being a Missionary. Pasadena: William Carey Library, 1995.

Jones, Marge. Psychology of Missionary Adjustment. Springfield, Missouri: Gospel Publishing House, 1995.

Kane, J. Herbert. Life and Work on the Mission Field. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1980.

Hesselgrave, David L. Paradigms in Conflict: 10 Key Questions in Christian Missions Today. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Kregel Publications, 2005.

Howard, Kevin L. “A Call to Missions: Is there Such a Thing.” Evangelical Missions Quarterly, October, 2003.

Moreau, Scott, Netland, Harold, van Engen, Charles Edward, and Burnett, David. Evangelical Dictionary of World Missions. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2000.

Nayak, Abhijit. “Christian Ministry: Call or Career.” Evangelical Missions Quarterly, October, 2008.

O’Donnell, Kelly. Missionary Care: Counting the Cost for World Evangelization. Pasadena, California: William Carey Library, 1999.

Pirolo, Neal. Serving as Senders. San Diego: Emmaus Road, International, 1990.

Steffen, Tom and Douglas, Lois McKinney. Encountering Missionary Life and Work. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2008.

Swick, Nanette. “Survival of the Fittest.” Evangelical Missions Quarterly, January, 2001.

Terry, John Mark. Church Evangelism. Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 1984.

William B. Taylor, ed. Too Valuable To Lose. Pasadena, California: William Carey Library, 1997.

Verkuyl, J. Contemporary Missiology: An Introduction. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1978.

Waddell, Gregory S. “Missionary Burnout: Who is adequate for these things?” Evangelical Missions Quarterly, July, 2008.

Wingfield, Mark. “Disagreements discounted as source of missionary attrition.” Baptist Standard, April 24, 2000.

The Missionary Call - from a Member Care Perspective PART VIII - FINAL PART, Suggestions for Best Practice



Suggestions for Best Practice


Sending agencies should utilize the missionary call as a close ally and friend. From the very beginning of the screening process the missionary call has immense member care implications.


Here are a few suggestions for best practice.

First, the missionary call is powerful. Most definitions of the missionary call use the adjectives “intense” or “passionate” in their attempts to show the power that this call has upon a person’s life. This intensity should not be discouraged. It is a wind to fill the sails of the missionary embarking towards the Nations.

Second, remember that the missionary call is not merely a solitary call. It involves the larger body of Christ. The best verification of the missionary call is not a mystical feeling, but is a desire that follows the Word of God and is seconded by the larger body of Christ. Gung-ho missionary candidates, lest they “run without being sent” should be patient and heed this advice, “Be open to take time to let others be convinced of [your] call.”

Third, there is no real conflict regarding the missionary call and aggressive recruiting. Agencies and mission boards should continue to aggressively recruit candidates, even while being willing to exercise due caution so that those sent by the agency are those sent by God. Churches who have an infectious passion for missions and pastors who closely mentor and disciple their people may be the means by which the Lord implants a growing call into their people. Churches that give opportunities to exercise spiritual gifts and confirm those gifts empower their people to further explore what God may be calling them into.

Fourth, note that the missionary call plays a vital role not only in recruiting missionaries, but in screening candidates as well. If a candidate lacks a clear sense of call, or if this call is not seconded and confirmed by the larger body of Christ, agencies should take note and exercise caution. One of the largest reasons for negative missionary attrition is a “lack of call.” The solution is to screen more carefully to determine the presence of this sustaining ingredient from the very beginning.

Fifth, organizations should “test the call” through various internship programs, training programs, camps, and candidate schools. A missionary call will not only last through stress and hardship; it will make the candidate last through stress and hardship. Though hard to define and far from objective and measurable, one way in which organizations can screen candidates for this missionary call is to allow a testing period and to provide a testing program. Such testing is a very positive thing and should be encouraged and not merely seen as a trap to “weed people out.” It is, instead, a tool of stewardship used by the larger body of Christ to bless a candidate by helping them discern God’s will.

Sixth, the missionary call is one of the most powerful forces in retaining missionaries on the field. When times get tough, having a clear call is sometimes all that retains missionaries in some settings. When positive results and ministry fruits do not occur, the call is a powerful motivator for perseverance. When money fails, health fails and relationships fail, a missionary driven by a strong sense of call can endure until better days come.

Many missionaries have reported over a decade of wearisome labor before God finally converts the first soul in their people-group, and some labor even longer. A sense of strong and clear calling provides the missionary with persevering strength. It communicates, “God is the one that has called me here. I will stay and persevere because I am exactly where He would have me.”

Also, when a missionary possesses a clear call this is usually seconded by a multitude of other voices, such as friends, home church, and agency. All of these parties affirm the missionary’s call and can act as invaluable sources of social support from which the hurting missionary can draw strength. Agencies and churches should utilize the missionary call as a tool in counseling. Counselors can affirm the call and encourage perseverance by reminding the missionary, “Even though things are rough right now, we are confident that God has brought you here and will sustain you in your God-ordained work; we are behind you!”

The missionary call gives tenacity and perseverance in the midst of trials. There is an inverse relationship between a clear missionary call and attrition and those missionaries who have a clear call have lower rates of attrition.

The analogy comparing the missionary call to a wind that fills the sails of the missionary has already been given. This divine wind fills the sails and propels the missionary across cultures. Also, in times of trouble, consider this analogy. The power of the missionary call as an anchor that fixes the missionary’s vessel in place when adverse winds blow. The call not only moves the missionary into service, but it fixes the missionary in place once they arrive at their God-ordained destination.






CONCLUSION

Despite many differences regarding its exact nature, the missionary call is real and does, in fact, exist. This call is of vital importance related to issues of member care. Finally, this missionary call can be a vital ally that can be utilized in gaining quality missionaries and retaining them. Those focusing on the care of missionaries would do well to adapt their procedures to take full advantage of this ally. Let us give the missionary call its due place of honor. 

The Missionary Call - from a Member Care Perspective PART VII - Some negatives about the missionary call




The negative aspects of the missionary call

A strong sense of missionary call is largely a positive factor. There are, however, two aspects in which a strong sense of call is negative. First, a false call can be used to manipulate other people. Second, a “totalitarian call” can consume all of a missionary’s life and lead to missionary burnout.



False Calls:

First, false “missionary calls” can be used as a manipulative tool. A person may claim to be “sure” that the Holy Spirit is leading them in a particular direction and yet wreak havoc on their lives and the lives of others. Pronouncements of “God’s calling” may, in fact, be used as a manipulative tool so that a person may further their own agenda. After all, who can argue with the call of God?

Frank Allen muses that, “Ralph Winter once remarked that the words, "The Lord is leading me," are probably one of the greatest obstacles to effective missionary work.”

Such people often are not the best team players. Agencies and churches, therefore, should screen wisely for past and present relationship patterns of dysfunction. These people may be quite persuasive and may even convince others of this call. Self-confidence and assertion opens many doors. Egocentric personalities that utilize spiritual matters for personal gain, for enhancement of reputation and status, or as a means of social control over others must be screened out.

Marge Jones writes about “the pedestal” of missionary service and how this serves to humble us and yet, at the same time, set us apart into a unique category of people based upon our call. Even for truly called missionaries this may prove to be snare.

Jones warns us:

Individuals placed on a pedestal because of their call to the mission field need to understand how much this treatment has influenced their thoughts and actions and how detrimental the results can be when they arrive overseas.


The All-Consuming Call:

Second, another danger is that the missionary call may become a tyrant instead of a friend and ally.

It may consume the missionary’s whole life.

While a strong sense of missionary call and urgency is often what drives candidates to the field and sustains them, it can also eat them alive.

Gregory Waddell calls this the “totalitarian call” and describes it this way:

Any job can become your entire life if you let it. Missionaries and pastors are especially prone to this scenario because their job is their life. It could be argued that the two should not be separated; ministry, after all, is a divine calling. This temptation to allow the mission to absorb everything we are and everything we do is harmful both to the missionary and to his or her family.

Thus, while the missionary call is a strong motivator and sustainer in missions, it can also drive the missionary to exhaustion. If left unchecked all other aspects of the missionary’s life can become pushed to the side leading to attrition. Thus, an intense and urgent sense of calling can become a case of “too much of a good thing.”

The Missionary Call - from a Member Care Perspective PART VI - a call may change over time




The call of God may change over time

Discussing the call of God in relation to missionary attrition may lead one to the mistaken notion that the call of God never changes and that all cases of missionaries leaving a field of service are unfortunate events.

Here is a disclaimer: the call of God may change over time.

God may call us to a field for a limited time and even call us away from a field. Tom Steffen writes about older missionary assumptions, that these often possessed a “no turning back mindset.” A return home before one was rendered too old or too ill for service meant “turning your back on God’s will.”

Steffen then contrasts this older view with present realities:

Today much has changed...Missionaries who spend their lives in a single place have become far and few between. Even if they serve with the same mission agency for their entire career, they are likely to have a variety of assignments and serve in more than one culture.

Perhaps this disclaimer makes an already ambiguous topic even more ambiguous, but it is a needed addition to any discussion about the call of God. Transitions are common in ministry and we cannot count all of these transitions as examples of failures or “negative attrition.”

God may call us to perform certain time-limited tasks and then that call may end and another may begin. Most would not propose that a missionary can never retire. Sensing the call of God on one’s life is not a one-time event at the beginning of one’s missionary career, but a continual process of checking one’s life not only against the Scripture, but also one’s desires and situations in life. God’s call is what helps get missionaries to the mission field, sustain them on the mission field, but can also draw them from that field into another work.




Some would disagree, however, with this assertion. As recently as October of 2008 the Evangelical Missions Quarterly published these words by Abhijit Nayak:

The ministry has become more career-oriented than call-oriented. As far as scripture is concerned, in ministry there is no retirement. God’s servant has no relief from the ministry; he or she is committed until his or her last breath.



A full scale theological treatment of every facet of the missionary call is not possible in this short paper. Suffice it to say, however, that the above statement by Mr. Nayak may either prove to exhibit the true grit that exemplifies a called missionary, or it may inflict needless guilt on those missionaries transitioning to different roles or retiring due to health or old age.

The Missionary Call - from a Member Care Perspective PART V - The Call as a factor in sustaining missionaries





The Missionary Call as a Factor in Sustaining Missionaries

The missionary call is vital in recruiting and screening missionaries. The missionary call is also invaluable in sustaining missionaries. The missionary call is an ally which may be utilized to strengthen and preserve the troubled missionary, as Kelly O’ Donnell advises:

If a missionary becomes dysfunctional or struggles excessively with ministry issues, it may be wise to review his/her present walk with God and the original call from God concerning missionary work.

The original call, being what compelled the believer to enter missionary service originally, can also be a member care tool to keep them there. Since a clear call will have clear confirmations by the larger body of Christ, the troubled missionary should never lack a wide array of affirmation and support. If the missionary’s initial call was confirmed by the larger body of Christ and the sending agency, even if that missionary has his own momentary doubts about his calling, a large number of supportive believers can strengthen that weary missionary from many sides.

The following illustrates this dynamic well:

Paul and Barnabas were confirmed in their missionary call by the church in Antioch (Acts 13:1-4). Many ministers, including missionaries, have had churches confirm their call to ministry because they had watched how they developed a lifestyle of obedience. It is a further confirmation when they support the missionaries in prayer as they go to the mission field. There is also the confirmation that comes through a sending body which affirms that they are gifted for this kind of ministry...When missionaries go to the field, they become aware of the value of having such a “call” from the Lord. When they are asked what difference the call has made to them, the characteristic response is that it has functioned as a stabilizer in their lives during times of crisis. It has a stabilizing effect when the missionaries sense that God has equipped them spiritually with the gifts necessary to carry out a task, and in crisis times the Lord is guiding them. Missionaries sense a stability just knowing that others believe in them.

A steady supplement of, “We believe in you, we affirmed your calling, we attest that God’s gifts are upon you, and we support you,” can do wonders for the missionary in times of stress. It is an invigorating tonic.

Neal Pirolo illustrates the immense moral support that comes from the larger body of Christ:

The church, the home fellowship, the missions fellowship, the prayer group, the college and career class – some group besides the ones wanting to go need to hear the Holy Spirit say, “Separate unto Me [the Barnabas and Saul from your fellowship] for the task to which I have called them.” This confirmation provides tremendous moral support! It is one thing for your missionary to think the Lord has directed him. It is incredibly more reassuring to know He has confirmed it in the hearts of others as well.


The support of the body of Christ towards a missionary rarely ends with mere affirmation. When a missionary call is confirmed by the larger body of Christ, moral support is far from the only thing provided. Multiplied prayers ascend to heaven on behalf of the beleaguered. Material support is more easily attained when the larger body of Christ stamps a missionary with their own seal of approval. Special aid, material assistance and added resources can all serve to buttress the struggling missionary in times of need. Like a frontline soldier amply supplied with the “beans and bullets” needed to sustain the war effort, the missionary is sent forth by the multiplied efforts of many.

The REMAP II study writes the following:

The committed endorsement of the pastor and local church may have an added contribution for retention beyond confirming the call of the candidate. If the church and pastor confirm the call to the mission agency it seems likely that the church would feel greater obligation or responsibility to support in prayer and finances.

A true missionary call results in a missionary being sent, and the one who is sent is sent by a community. The blessings provided by this sending community do not end once the missionary is sent, but can be tapped in times of need as a source of strength, affirmation and comfort.



A Clear Missionary Call and Missionary Attrition: an Inverse Relationship

Two things are striking regarding the correlation between the missionary call and missionary attrition. First, a clear call is one of the most important factors in missionary longevity. Second, the perception by the missionary that he lacks a call or has lost his call are major factors impacting missionary attrition.



The missionary call - one of the top factors in missionary retention.


In the ReMAP II study on missionary attrition, a strong sense of calling possessed, “a strong correlation with retention.” In fact, a clear calling rated as a higher factor in retention than even prior ministry experience. The verdict is clear; a strong sense of calling prevents negative missionary attrition.

The Association of Foreign Missions, meeting in 1998, focused on the topic of missionary “survival” and found that “a definite call to cross-cultural service” was a key ingredient in all of the successful case studies examined.

A “determination to dig in your heels no matter how tough it gets, based on the conviction that you are in the exact place God wants you, ministerially as well as geographically” is vital to missionary longevity.




Doubts about one’s call, or a sense of loss or lack of call is devastating

The World Evangelical Fellowship conducted a study of missionary attrition in the 1990’s consisting of findings from 14 nations, broken down into OSC’s (Old Sending Countries) and NSC’s (New Sending Countries). This landmark ReMAP I study (Reducing Missionary Attrition Project I) interviewed personnel from 453 sending agencies, the total number of these missionary interviews was approximately 31,000, or 1/5th of the known global evangelism force.

The results of ReMAP I were analyzed and published in the book Too Valuable to Lose, edited by Dr. Bill Taylor. ReMAP I’s results encouraged further research. ReMAP II, focusing on obtaining best practices for retention, was completed at the end of 2003 and its results were published in the book Worth Keeping.

The WEF study found that the category “lack of call” influenced an average of 4.1% of missionaries who attritted. Of the NSC’s (new sending countries) fully 8% of attritting missionary personnel listed “lack of call” as the main reason for their attrition.

Finally, the WEF found that “the most important factor in preventing attrition was reported to be the missionary having a clear call.” Asked to list all the top reasons for leaving the field, fully 23% of missionaries from the New Sending Nations marked “Yes” for the reason “Lack of a clear call.” This 23% response is shared with the response “Lack of Home support” as the top reason for negative missionary attrition.

The Southern Baptist International Mission Board (IMB) has one of the lowest attrition rates on record. However, of that very low rate of attrition issues centering on “the call” figured prominently:

The most common reason cited for leaving missionary appointment last year was a change in understanding of God's call. That explanation accounted for 25 percent of all departures. "Fifty-eight individuals resigned because of a change of call; six resigned because they felt they were never really called; and four resigned because their families in the U.S. did not affirm their call," noted an executive summary of the study presented to trustees.


It is evident, therefore, that a clear missionary call, seconded by the larger body of Christ who affirms and supports that call is key to improving member care.

The Missionary Call - from a Member Care Perspective PART IV - Recruiting and Screening Missionaries





The missionary call as a factor in recruiting and screening potential missionaries

The missionary call is one of the most important considerations in the screening of missionaries.

A strong missionary call correlates to longer missionary careers and lower rates of preventable missionary attrition. A clear calling has been consistently reported as more important than regular financial support, family support, relationships with other missionaries and even the maintenance of one’s own personal, spiritual life. Even if the definitions of the missionary call vary by candidate, what is of prime importance is that they feel that they have been called.

In fact, “It appears to matter little (as far as retention is concerned) what the call is to and what it consists of,” the important thing is that a candidate has intensely thought-out what they feel God’s call is for them so that they may develop a tenacity in their resolve to serve even in hard times due to this personal ownership of what they believe that God has called them to.



Testing the call


Due to the unsoundness of many churches and even entire denominations, sadly, mission agencies must not take a candidate’s word or even his home church’s confirmation at face value. A self-report of a call, and even a confirmation by a local church must be reviewed by the missionary organization. It is the responsibility of any sending agency, therefore, to “test the call.” If a missionary call is present, it will manifest itself as a persistent and tenacious trait that will not disappear during a short, trial period, camp, or training program. Virtually every missionary agency has instituted some sort of candidating program, training camp, internship or training program as a matter of good stewardship for all parties involved. Missionary candidates and sending churches should not balk at such requirements. Valuable lessons are learned, practice in endurance is given and the candidate’s call and the church’s confirmation of that call are usually verified by successful completion of these programs.



The missionary call and aggressive recruitment – is there a conflict?

Missions mobilizers use such slogans as, “The need is the call,” and “You don’t have a call? The call came 2,000 years ago in the form of the Great Commission – what are you waiting for?” Another slogan claims that “everyone should head towards the mission field unless God stops them.” These missions mottoes may highlight the need for personnel, but just how biblical are they?

If the missionary call is a special and exclusive divine calling, should we recruit for missions? If we recruit for missions, how should it be done? As David Hesselgrave phrases it, is this a matter of “a call for missionaries or a Divine calling?” Is there a conflict between aggressive missionary recruiting and in “waiting on the Divine Call?”

Hesselgrave reflects:

In the first place, there is no general call for missionary volunteers in the New Testament. All New Testament missionaries were personally conscripted by Christ, his apostles and their representatives, or by the Holy Spirited-directed churches.


It is my conviction that appealing for workers and waiting on the call are not mutually exclusive. We need not fall into a false dilemma on this topic. Let us seek to aggressively recruit those whom the Lord is calling.

There are dangers, however, in aggressive missionary recruiting. A longing to see more workers cannot excuse a lowering of standards. Mission agencies and churches run the risk of allowing people to “run” who are not “sent” if proper screening and training are not corporate values. Some may be attracted to the “sales appeal” of missionary promotionals and push through the missionary selection process due to magnetic personalities, and yet possess bad motives and troubling theologies that are only discovered in their first term on the field, after significant damage has already been done. Abhijit Nayak bemoans the fact that often, “Present-day ministers decide by themselves whether or not to go into ministry.”

We must always remember that the missionary call normally occurs in the context of a believer in close relation with the larger corporate body of Christ. This larger corporate body can confirm the call based upon observed confirmation of requisite gifting and character. Missions is a body of Christ effort. Recruiting for missions should be the same. Displaying needs and aggressively making known those needs might be the God-ordained means by which the Lord moves individuals and churches to send some of their own, and if the Lord is moving then He is not going to speak to one party exclusively. As Neal Pirolo stresses, “The local fellowship of believers must take the initiative in the missionary process by identifying the cross-cultural parts of the Body and allowing them to exercise their gifts.” The missionary call involves a lot of people.